Given that I took the h520e rtk to do surveys and not as a tester like for autel evo, it is clear that I will do some tests to understand how to exploit its full potential, but this does not dispense yuneec from criticism for an attitude of complete absence of answers for its customers. Having said that, for now I have carried out several flights in rtk and I am at first evaluating the reliability of this method which, anyway, reports a series of anomalies that I am evaluatingYes, the Evo II Pro RTK will have 6K video capability but only at 30p and the image sensor is the same as the H520E RTK.
The EVO is available pretty much everywhere "as a test" but they are now 6 months behind in delivery so obviously they haven't gotten it all figured out yet. Oh and where exactly does Autel state the positional accuracy of the unit in flight? They don't... only the hovering.
As I have said multiple times we all understand that there are a lack of instructions for the PPK processing on the H520E RTK. It's pretty obvious what is on the mSD card so why don't you state what specifically you are having trouble understanding? It would be much more helpful to troubleshoot the process than continuing to wail about the lack of support on a user forum expecting a corporate answer. My personal opinion is that if you are not willing to dig in and help us all figure out the best PPK workflow then you are probably one of those individuals that should just stick with the ease of the RTK.